Taxing robots: Unintended consequences of robotic innovation

• Author:
• Author name

  Quantumrun Foresight
• August 24, 2022

Insight summary

The concept of taxing companies for using robots instead of human workers has sparked considerable debate, with arguments for and against its impact on employment and economic growth. Critics point out that such a tax could slow down technological adoption in critical industries, potentially limiting productivity and innovation. Meanwhile, proponents suggest that revenue from this tax could fund retraining programs for workers displaced by automation, fostering a balance between progress and workforce development.

Taxing robots context

The idea of a robot tax has gained traction since the late 2010s, with several businesspeople and politicians advocating for its implementation. The idea is that companies would be charged a tax for replacing human workers with robots. While proponents of a robot tax are well-intentioned, there are several reasons why such a tax would be counterproductive, according to industry experts.

As robots increasingly enter the workforce, many analysts are asking: Should the use of robots be taxed to fund retraining programs for the humans they replace? While there are some benefits to using robots, such as increased productivity and safety, there are also drawbacks, including potential job losses and decreased wages. Less human workers ultimately mean lower salary tax revenues to fund public social services. 

There are several considerations that policymakers need to take into account when considering a robot tax, including which sectors should be targeted and how the revenue should be used. Policymakers should also investigate how robots will affect employment and how to assist individuals who have lost their jobs owing to technological changes. Some industries that may be heavily affected are the transport, logistics, and manufacturing sectors. Considering what scale of revenue a robot tax might raise to pay for specialized retirement assistance or retraining programs is also crucial. Any discussions about introducing a new tax must also align with broader efforts to tax parts of the economy that generate significant sums of tax revenues instead of relying on regular workers and consumers.

Disruptive impact

The debate on robot taxation hinges on the validity of robots replacing jobs, with some experts citing evidence that contradicts this belief. Research from 2021 indicates that companies using robots experience higher employment growth compared to their non-robot-using counterparts. These companies also tend to be more productive, which can translate into benefits for consumers through improved quality and reduced costs of products and services. However, the challenge lies in defining what constitutes a robot, as varying definitions could lead to disparate impacts on different sectors, irrespective of their reliance on human labor.

Imposing a robot tax could have unintended consequences, such as hindering the adoption of robotics and thus affecting economic growth, particularly in sectors heavily reliant on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This slower adoption rate could dampen overall economic dynamism. Moreover, the technology sector and research in automation might face setbacks due to the diversion of funds towards tax liabilities rather than innovation. 

In light of these considerations, public officials seeking to mitigate the effects of automation on the workforce might explore alternative strategies. These could include addressing tax disparities between capital and labor, reducing labor market frictions, and investing in education and training programs that equip workers with future-oriented skills. Such measures could offer a more balanced approach, supporting workers affected by automation while fostering an environment conducive to technological progress and economic growth. 

Implications of robot taxes

Wider implications of robot taxes may include: 

• Companies, particularly smaller ones, reducing their use of robotic technologies, potentially missing out on significant productivity improvements that robotics could offer.


• The robotics industry facing a slowdown in revenue growth and advancements in innovation, as businesses start perceiving robots more as financial burdens than beneficial assets.


• Governments engaging in policy debates over implementing a robot tax or adjusting the policy to include a cap on taxation for robot usage.


• Specific government policies possibly emerging to exempt small and medium-sized enterprises from robot taxes, aiming to support these businesses in their technological endeavors.


• Artificial intelligence and machine learning research experiencing a decrease in funding, as companies scale back their automation initiatives in response to potential financial implications.


• Enhanced demand for workers skilled in technology taxation, as more companies seek to reduce robot taxes and fees.

Questions to consider

• Do you agree that there should be a robot tax?


• What are the other potential challenges this tax may pose to technology companies utilizing automation?